People v. Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• MRE 804[a][5] found to supersede less restrictive former testimony statute
• MRE 804[a][5] found to supersede less restrictive former testimony statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lawton
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-10-19· cited 155×
• People v. James
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-01-21· cited 34×
• McDOUGALL v. ELIUK
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 26×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ohio v. Roberts
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
• Barber v. Page
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
• People v. Dye
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 62×
• People v. McIntosh
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1973-02-20· cited 29×
• People v. Starr
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-04-02· cited 16×
• People v. Shipp
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-23· cited 10×
• Michigan v. Dye
  Supreme Court· 1988-12-05· cited 3×