People v. Collins
Citations
- 105 Cal. 504
- 39 P. 16
- 1895 Cal. LEXIS 684
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Indictment — Jurisdiction or State and Federal Courts—Pleading—Matter or Detense.—The jurisdiction of the state being general over persons within its limits, and that of the United States being exceptional over places purchased for specified uses of the general government, it is not necessary, in an indictment or information in the state courts, to negative the jurisdiction of the federal courts, but, if the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over the offense, it is matter of defense simply.</p> <p>Id.—Federal Jurisdiction or Crimes—Ownership or Land.—The mere ownership by the United States of land or property within the county does not show any federal jurisdiction over crimes committed upon ig unless the ownership is shown to have been acquired by purchase with the consent of the legislature, or under the power of eminent domain authorized by the legislature.</p> <p>Id.—Question or Fact—Judicial Notice.—Federal jurisdiction involves a question of fact as to the acquisition of property by the United States by purchase, or under proceedings to condemn it, of which the courts will not take judicial notice.</p> <p>Id.—Impanelment or Jury—Failure or Jurors to Respond.—Where, during the formation of a jury during the trial of a criminal cause, one of the venire men failed to respond to his name when called by the clerk, it is not error for the court to refuse to delay the proceedings until such venire men can be brought into court by attachment, where there are present more than enough of venire men to fill the panel of jurors.</p> <p>Id.—Attachment of Jurors—Discretion.—Whether an attachment shall issue for absent jurors who have been summoned and failed to respond to their names when called by the clerk is within the discretion of the court; and the defendant has no absolute right under the law to have the first juror called present to be examined before he is required to proceed.</p> <p>Id.—Bias of Jurors—Newspaper Statements.—Where the exam
Cited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-31· cited 418×
- People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-05-05· cited 337×
- People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-01-30· cited 232×
- State v. FouquetteNevada Supreme Court· 1950-08-10· cited 113×
- People v. FredericksCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-03-21· cited 45×
- People v. CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-08-17· cited 41×
- Rucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-07-16· cited 30×
- In Re CarmenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-08-02· cited 20×
- People v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court· 1899-04-06· cited 18×
- State v. DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas· 1901-07-06· cited 16×
- Pueblo v. SuárezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1937-07-13· cited 9×
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court· 1900-12-10· cited 5×
- People v. SuárezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1937-07-13
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.