Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/29/2002

People v. Collier

Citations

  • 329 Ill. App. 3d 744
  • 263 Ill. Dec. 507
  • 768 N.E.2d 267
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Subject to constitutional limitations and within a reasonable time after the filing of a written motion by the State, defense counsel shall inform the State of any defenses which he intends to make at a hearing or trial.”
  • “Given the lack of insight as to the character of his testimony and reasons for failing to present it during his case in chief, we cannot say that the trial court clearly abused its discretion when denying defendant’s motion to reopen his case.”
  • “[F]or the trial court to have found that defendant’s testimony was of such importance to warrant the reopening of his case, an offer of proof should have been presented - 19 - No. 1-18-1247 before the court ruled on his request or immediately thereafter.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.