Skip to main content
· 9/1/2017

People v. Colin (Samuel)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that unchallenged findings are deemed to have sufficient record support and are binding for purposes of appellate review
  • “The trial court’s assessment of a juvenile’s best interest at the dispositional stage is reviewed only for abuse of discretion.”
  • “Respondent further argues. . . the trial court should have considered other dispositional alternatives, such as granting guardianship or custody to the foster family, thereby leaving a legal avenue by which [the juveniles] could maintain a relationship with their father.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.