Skip to main content

People v. Cole

Citations

  • 550 N.E.2d 723
  • 193 Ill. App. 3d 990
  • 140 Ill. Dec. 838
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although a special concurrence in Cole questioned the validity of this special standard (Cole, 193 Ill. App. 3d at 998-99, 550 N.E.2d at 728-29 (Steigmann, J., specially concurring))
  • although a special concur­rence in Cole ques­tioned the validity of this special stan­dard ( Cole , 193 Ill. App. 3d at 998-99, 550 N.E.2d at 728-29 (Steigmann, J., specially concur­ring))
  • abrogated on other grounds by People v. Schott, 145 Ill. 2d 188 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spitz, Steigmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.