People v. Cobb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no right to counsel “[b]ased upon the civil nature of this . . . proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ursery
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
• United States v. 7108 West Grand Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, Feliberto Flores and Isabellita Flores, Claimants-Appellants
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 123×
• People v. Milton
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-02-23· cited 87×
• In Re Marriage of Hartley
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1995-01-17· cited 79×
• United States v. $100,375.00 in U.S. Currency, Curtis McDonald
  Sixth Circuit· 1995-11-28· cited 26×
• Padilla v. Padilla
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1982-04-29· cited 19×
• People v. One 1979 Volkswagen
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-03-02· cited 4×
• People v. Ferrel
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-11-29· cited 3×
• Flores v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 2×
• People v. Frank
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1996-10-24· cited 1×