People v. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]ny statement by an accused person, unless excluded by the privilege against self-incrimination or other exclusionary rules, may be used against him as an admission” (citing People v. Howell, 53 Ill. App. 3d 465 (1977))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Washington
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 364×
• People v. Aguilar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-15· cited 78×
• In re Zariyah A.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-03-28· cited 28×
• People v. Moleterno
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-24· cited 16×
• People v. Rousey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-01-30· cited 4×
• People v. O'Daniell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-08-28

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• People v. Caballero
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 434×
• People v. Friedman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-03-28· cited 148×
• People v. Holtzman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1953-11-18· cited 72×
• People v. Martin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-01-25· cited 62×
• People v. Starks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-05-31· cited 51×
• People v. Howell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-09-29· cited 27×
• People v. Haymer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-04-07· cited 19×
• People v. Chew
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-09-14· cited 18×
• People v. Shaw
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-16· cited 13×
• People v. Buxton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-05-07· cited 8×
• People v. Wicks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-11-21· cited 6×
• People v. Gray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-03-02· cited 4×