Skip to main content

People v. Class

Citations

  • 67 N.Y.2d 431
  • 494 N.E.2d 444
  • 503 N.Y.S.2d 313
  • 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18616

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to follow Supreme Court’s interpretation of Fourth Amendment in interpreting state constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
  • declining to follow Supreme Court's interpretation of Fourth Amendment in interpreting state constitution's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
  • The Supreme Court reviewed a New York decision because of a lack of a plain statement that it relied upon state law. On remand, the Court of Appeals of New York reinstated its earlier judgment, stating that it found a violation of its state constitution.
  • The Supreme Court reviewed a New York decision because of a lack of a plain statement that it relied upon slate law. On remand, the Court of Appeals of New York reinstated its earlier judgment, stating that it found a violation of its state constitution.
  • disallowing entry into vehicle to uncover vehicle identification number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.