People v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute tolled where the state moved for a fitness hearing over the defense counsel’s objections, even though no fitness hearing was found to be necessary following the examination
• “[T]he speedy[-]trial term is tolled by such an examination for the time during which the examination is conducted, even though no fitness hearing is found to be necessary following the examination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Palacio
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-11· cited 22×
• People v. Turley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-10-15· cited 9×
• People v. Moore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-04-18· cited 8×
• People v. Oliver
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-27· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Sonntag
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-10-30· cited 14×
• People v. Davis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-08-21· cited 14×