People v. Ciminera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer was not justified in stopping the defendant under section 545.058(a
• holding that an officer lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop where the trial court found that it was unclear from the officer’s dashcam video if the defendant’s tires were touching the shoulder line
• stating that an appellate court reviews a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress under the standard of abused discretion
• stating that we review rulings on motions to suppress for abuse of discretion
• noting that the reasonable-suspicion standard is an objective, rather than subjective, standard
• appellate court reviews de novo application of law to facts that do not turn on credibility and demeanor and whether circumstances support existence of reasonable suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).