People v. Chung

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this non-case-specific language was an inadequate explanation for an upward variance
• concluding that similar, non-case-specific language was inadequate to explain upward variance
• applying plain error review to an unpreserved procedural challenge to the adequacy of the district court's sentencing explanation
• \Inadequate explanation is a recognized sentencing error.\ (citing Gall, 552 U.S. at 51)
• vacating a 20% upward variance there

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).