People v. Chriswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “a defendant may not be cross-examined regarding his post-arrest silence unless the defendant’s trial testimony is inconsistent with the pretrial statements that were made to police”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Frieberg
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 332×
• People v. Nunn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-29· cited 32×
• Sakosko v. Memorial Hospital
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-07· cited 30×
• People v. Foster
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-07-05· cited 29×
• Hernandez v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-02· cited 16×
• People v. Bradley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-18· cited 16×
• People v. Moody
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-22· cited 15×
• People v. Sanchez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-07-22· cited 13×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-31· cited 6×
• People v. Little
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-30· cited 5×
• People v. Torres
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-29