People v. Christy F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court's oral ruling satisfied the writing requirement contained in section 2-28 of the Act because in its oral ruling the trial court specifically relied on DCFS and CASA reports, and these reports adequately contained the basis for the court's decision
• holding that the trial court’s oral ruling satisfied the writing requirement contained in section 2 — 28 of the Act because in its oral ruling the trial court specifically relied on DCFS and CASA reports, and these reports adequately contained the basis for the court’s decision
• holding that the trial court’s oral ruling satisfied the writing requirement contained in section 2–28 of the Act because in its oral ruling the trial court specifically relied on DCFS and CASA reports, and these reports adequately contained the basis for the court’s decision
• holding the trial court’s oral ruling satisfied the writing requirement contained in section 2-28 of the Juvenile Court Act because it specifically relied on DCFS reports and these reports adequately contained the basis for the court’s decision
• “Of primary concern is permanency and stability in the lives of children involved in termination proceedings.”
• section 1-5(3) acts as a safeguard to a parent's due process rights inherent in their fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and control of their children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).