People v. Chirchirillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the relevant facts are uncontested and the issue concerns whether these uncontested facts establish the elements of [the offense], we review de novo defendant’s claim.”
• “Because the relevant facts are uncontested and the issue concerns whether these uncontested facts establish the elements of [the offense], we review de novo defendant’s claim.”
• conviction of unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon through accountability was reversed where evidence did not establish that codefendant was in fact a convicted felon
• defendant cannot be accountable for unlawful possession of weapon by felon where State failed to establish that principal was felon
• defendant cannot be accountable for unlawful possession of weapon by felon where State failed to establish that principal was felon
• where the relevant facts were uncontested and the issue concerned whether those uncontested facts established the elements of unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon under an accountability theory, de novo review was appropriate for defendant’s claim on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).