People v. Cherif

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “Congress' unequivocal” “approval of, the Corps' regulations interpreting the [Act] to cover wetlands adjacent to navigable waters”
• explaining that the Court “would not extend Chevron deference” to an agency interpretation involving “federal encroachment upon a traditional state power.”
• explaining that the courts expect a “clear indication” of congressional intent when an “administrative interpretation . alters the federal-state framework by permitting federal encroachment upon a traditional state power”
• declining, post- Babbitt , to address relationship between Chevron and agency regulation interpreting statute with criminal sanction
• taking a different view from the Corps as to the value of subsequent legislative history in statutory interpretation
• taking a different view from the Corps as to the value of subsequent legislative history in statutory interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).