Supreme Court of Colorado· 6/18/1984
People v. Cheeks
Citations
- 682 P.2d 484
- 1984 Colo. LEXIS 563
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the rule which governs sequestration prohibits exclusion of an officer or an employee of a nonnatural party who has been designated as its representative
- both Delaware and Colorado have adopted F.R.E. 615 into their states' evidence rules
- both Delaware and Colorado have adopted F.R.E. 615 into their states' evidence rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovira
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MelendezSupreme Court of Colorado· 2004-12-06· cited 591×
- State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-12· cited 271×
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 253×
- Douglas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-04-27· cited 52×
- State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 7×
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ortiz TiradoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1986-01-15· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsFourth Circuit· 1983-03-23· cited 258×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund EdinboroughThird Circuit· 1980-06-09· cited 50×
- Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.D. Delaware· 1981-07-31· cited 48×
- United States v. Ronald Louis JonesEighth Circuit· 1982-09-14· cited 45×
- United States v. William ShearerEighth Circuit· 1979-10-05· cited 42×
- United States v. Ronald John HolmesEighth Circuit· 1979-03-16· cited 32×
- United States v. AlvaradoFifth Circuit· 1981-06-08· cited 32×
- In Re United States of AmericaFifth Circuit· 1978-11-02· cited 22×
- United States v. Ralph WoodyEighth Circuit· 1979-02-21· cited 15×
- People v. BurleySupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-06-17· cited 15×
- Martin v. PorakColorado Court of Appeals· 1981-12-24· cited 13×
- United States v. David P. NixFifth Circuit· 1979-08-23· cited 10×
- People v. PerezSupreme Court of Colorado· 1977-03-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.