California Court of Appeal· 10/2/1990
People v. Chapman
Citations
- 224 Cal. App. 3d 253
- 274 Cal. Rptr. 47
- 1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1052
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that inevitable discovery claim raised by People for first time on appeal turned on determination of facts not presented to trial court and was not subject to appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scotland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-06-28· cited 63×
- People v. FewsCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-09-24· cited 33×
- People v. FewsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-09-24
- People of Guam v. Joseph Quichocho Taimanglo II (aka Joseph Quichocho Taimanglo; aka Baby Joe; aka Joseph Quintanilla Taimanglo II)Supreme Court of Guam· 2025-10-23
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-19· cited 257×
- People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-12-19· cited 199×
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-09-13· cited 121×
- People v. ChaversCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-02-17· cited 55×
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-11-30· cited 18×
- Hernandez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1978-12-13· cited 7×
- People v. GorakCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-12-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.