People v. Chaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where public money is expended in pursuit of solving crimes, the expenditure is part of the investigatory agency’s normal operating costs and the agency is not considered a ‘victim’ for purposes of restitution”
• the restitution award was vacated as improper because an investigatory agency is not a “victim” for purposes of restitution
• the restitution award was vacated as improper because an investigatory agency is not a \victim\ for purposes of restitution
• the restitution award was vacated as improper because an investigatory agency is not a \victim\ for purposes of restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).