People v. Chambers
Citations
- 18 Cal. 382
- 1861 Cal. LEXIS 202
Syllabus
<p>Possession of stolen property is not alone sufficient to convict of larceny. Though such possession is a circumstance to be considered in determining the guilt of the possessor, still, in order to convict him, the prosecutor must add other circumstances indicative of guilt; and such other circumstances must be such as are naturally calculated to awaken suspicion against the party charged, and to corroborate the inference of guilty possession.</p>
Judges: Cope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-11-20· cited 375×
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-03· cited 65×
- People v. NajeraCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 58×
- State v. LeighSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-11-13· cited 22×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 19×
- People v. DickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-06-03· cited 18×
- People v. AntonioCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 12×
- People v. NoregeaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1874-07-01· cited 9×
- People v. ChampionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-08-19· cited 7×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-15· cited 7×
- State v. JanksIdaho Supreme Court· 1914-12-17· cited 6×
- People v. SwinfordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 3×
- State v. CassadySupreme Court of Kansas· 1874-01-15· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.