People v. Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding despite trial court’s admonition that defendant had right to appeal within 30 days of denial of postplea motion
• remanding where court did not communicate that postplea motion was condition precedent by stating the defendant had 30 days to file a postplea motion should he wish to “change [his] mind”
• trial court has duty to substantially admonish the defendant as to all subsections of Rule 605(b)
• trial court has duty to substantially admonish the defendant as to all subsections of Rule 605(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lloyd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-04-14· cited 77×
• People v. McKay
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-28· cited 54×
• People v. Dunn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-08· cited 31×
• People v. Crump
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-09-17· cited 17×
• People v. Cochrane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-08· cited 13×
• People v. Maltimore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-12-29· cited 11×
• People v. Pegues
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-01-25· cited 10×
• People of State of Illinois v. Flowers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-08-03· cited 4×
• People v. Dunn Modified Upon Denial of Rehearing - replaces opinion filed 6/27/03
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Wilk
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-10-20· cited 359×
• People v. Stacey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 63×
• People v. Radunz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-03-17· cited 27×
• People v. Favelli
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-18· cited 19×
• People v. Ahlstrand
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-03-21· cited 13×
• People v. Potts
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-08-08· cited 10×