People v. Carper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant didn’t have a subjective expectation of privacy in the contents of his shirt pocket after disclosing the presence of cocaine in the pocket to police officers
• holding that, by disclosing to an agent that he was carrying a bindle inside his pocket that contained cocaine, the defendant “did not manifest a subjective privacy interest in the contents of his pocket or of the bindle”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).