People v. Carbone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the three pink and white pills could not have been seized under the plain view doctrine since it was not ‘immediately apparent’ to [law enforcement] that the pills were either evidence of criminality or contraband”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Gutkaiss
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-07-14· cited 38×
• People v. Jackson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-07-28· cited 17×
• State v. Sanchez
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2015-05-28· cited 14×
• People v. Melendez
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-07-22· cited 9×
• People v. Layboult
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-05-09· cited 7×
• People v. Cotroneo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-12-09· cited 6×
• People v. Bell
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-07-21· cited 6×
• People v. Perez
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-10-25· cited 5×
• People v. King
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-09-29· cited 5×
• People v. Mullins
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-09-27· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Horton v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
• People v. Garafolo
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1974-03-25· cited 1,806×
• People v. Belton
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-02-11· cited 293×
• People v. Torres
  New York Court of Appeals· 1989-07-11· cited 189×
• People v. Finlayson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-09-22· cited 106×