People v. Cantey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding plea despite narration of the nature of the charges being given by the prosecutor rather than the court
• violations of technical requirements of Rule 11. are subject to harmless error analysis, but are not always harmless
• violations of technical requirements of Rule 11 are subject to harmless error analysis, but are not always harmless
• “It will be a rare case and one that we cannot presently envisage in which we look beyond the transcript of the arraignment in passing on an appeal after a guilty plea.”
• possession of marijuana with intent to distribute found to be a “simple charge”
• “Where each of Rule ll’s core inquiries has been reasonably implicated in the rule’s required colloquy, we will examine its treatment to determine whether it has been sufficiently exposed to inquiry and determination. If so, we will not disturb the result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).