People v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[w]here the State is permitted to introduce new matter in rebuttal, the accused should be permitted to introduce evidence in surrebuttal to contradict or affect the credibility of the rebuttal testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cavell
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 46×
• People v. Stewart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-13· cited 7×
• People v. Geitz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-25· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Manion
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 432×
• The PEOPLE v. Raby
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-09-24· cited 268×
• People v. Stringer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 228×
• The PEOPLE v. Lion
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1957-01-24· cited 72×
• The People v. Hammond
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-05-20· cited 45×
• People v. Limas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-02-04· cited 41×
• The PEOPLE v. Daugherty
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1969-11-26· cited 41×
• Ross v. Danter Associates, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-11-22· cited 34×
• People v. Waller
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 27×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-07-25· cited 20×
• People v. Musgray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-03-30· cited 19×
• People v. Acevedo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-25· cited 11×
• People v. White
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-10-26· cited 8×