People v. Camp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where dismissal of charges was disproportionate to State’s loss of evidence, giving adverse inference instruction was more appropriate discovery sanction
• “On remand, the trial court is to consider the appropriate sanction under Rule 415(g)(i) for the State’s discovery violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Attorney Grievance Commission v. James
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-03-16· cited 47×
• People v. Daniel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-03-31· cited 25×
• People v. Kladis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-07-22· cited 15×
• People v. Karim
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-07-28· cited 5×
• People v. Moravec
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-01-29· cited 4×
• People v. Aronson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-03-16· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-03-29· cited 1,536×
• People v. Newberry
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 108×
• Thorne v. Department of Public Safety
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-05-26· cited 90×
• People v. Koutsakis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-23· cited 46×
• People v. Crowder
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-07-20· cited 18×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-13· cited 16×
• In Matter of Goose Creek Drainage District No. 1
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-09-07· cited 2×