People v. Calseg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \many search and seizure issues [including reasonable suspicion] are resolved in the same manner\ under both the federal and Indiana constitutions
• holding that “many search and seizure issues [including reasonable suspicion] are resolved in the same manner” under both the federal and Indiana constitutions
• concluding that where both the driver of the car and the passenger, Campos, said the car searched belonged to Campos’ brother and it was uncontroverted that Campos had permission to use the car, Campos had standing to contest the search
• noting that “[m]any search and seizure issues are resolved in the same manner” under both the federal and Indiana Constitutions, one of which is reasonable suspicion
• noting nervousness in combination with inconsistent stories by car's occupants could support a finding of reasonable suspicion
• \[T]he Indiana Constitution provides protection for claimed possessions irrespective of the defendant's interest in the place where the possession was found.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).