People v. Byrd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Section 11-501] no longer provides a restriction on compulsory tests of bodily substances\
• “[Section 11 — 501] no longer provides a restriction on compulsory tests of bodily substances”
• “[Section 11–501] no longer provides a restriction on compulsory tests of bodily substances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Jones
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-02-03· cited 138×
• Michael Seiser v. City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-08-12· cited 32×
• People v. Coffin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-03· cited 29×
• People v. Ruppel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-03-22· cited 23×
• People v. Lukach
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-08· cited 17×
• People v. Ayres
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-30· cited 17×
• People v. Carey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-11-07· cited 9×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-12-05· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Cupp v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 739×
• People v. Todd
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 69×
• People v. Frazier
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-19· cited 30×