People v. Burt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adult defendant with IQ of 59 could not have “knowingly” committed sexual assault given inability to understand “the nature of the sex act” or to understand minor victim’s inability to understand it
• inability to possess the requisite mental state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Heaton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-09-13· cited 42×
• People v. Valdez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-06-29· cited 21×
• People v. Young
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-10-21· cited 15×
• State v. Werner
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-02-13· cited 11×
• People v. Mayo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-07-19· cited 10×
• People v. Braggs
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-28· cited 4×
• People v. Lang
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-01-21· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Rink
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-04· cited 92×
• People v. Rolston
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-04-25· cited 24×
• People v. Raseaitis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-08-09· cited 21×
• People v. Haas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-10-16· cited 14×
• People v. Farrokhi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-24· cited 11×