Skip to main content
· 7/25/2005

People v. Burke

Citations

  • 840 N.E.2d 281
  • 362 Ill. App. 3d 99
  • 298 Ill. Dec. 511
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defect in a statutory citation in a charging instrument does not warrant reversal where the charging instrument adequately informs the defendant of the charges and the defendant cannot demonstrate prejudice from the incorrect citation
  • \Armed robbery had the same elements in 1978 and 1980 as it did in 2001.\
  • a defect in a statutory citation in an indictment does not warrant reversal where the indictment adequately informs the defendant of the charges and the defendant cannot demonstrate prejudice from the incorrect citation
  • a defect in a statutory citation in an indictment does not warrant reversal where the indictment adequately informs the defendant of the charges and the defendant cannot demonstrate prejudice from the incorrect citation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.