People v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that prosecution need not demonstrate defendant’s knowledge of a right to refuse x-ray search because, given the common awareness of such security measures in airports, logical conclusion is that defendant voluntarily consented to such a search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hanson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-11-07· cited 36×
• In re Andre S.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-05-27· cited 6×
• People v. Waring
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-01-13· cited 4×
• People v. Ross
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-01-22· cited 2×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-02-22· cited 1×
• People v. Mercedes
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-01-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• People v. Kuhn
  New York Court of Appeals· 1973-12-27· cited 62×
• People v. Price
  New York Court of Appeals· 1981-12-22· cited 56×
• People v. Acosta
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-02-25· cited 20×
• People v. Le Grand
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-08-15· cited 8×