Skip to main content

People v. Brown

Citations

  • 80 N.Y.2d 729
  • 594 N.Y.S.2d 696
  • 610 N.E.2d 369
  • 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence”
  • holding that “spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence”
  • holding that \spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence\
  • finding the admission of two 911 tapes to be in accordance with New York’s present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule
  • taped 911 call described perpetrators and apprehension of them by the police; police arrived three minutes after call was initiated
  • taped 911 call described perpetrators and apprehension of them by the police; police arrived three minutes after call was initiated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hancock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

154 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.