Skip to main content

People v. Brown

Citations

  • 406 Ill. App. 3d 1068
  • 952 N.E.2d 32
  • 351 Ill. Dec. 659
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the initial-aggressor jury instruction was appropriately given where the evidence showed that the defendant became the aggressor when he pursued one of the victims, who was retreating
  • finding no plain error for an improper jury instruction where the evidence showed an intrusion and thus the outcome would have been the same if the proper instruction would have been given
  • the right of self-defense will not justify killing the original aggressor either for the purpose of retaliation or where the original aggressor has abandoned the confrontation
  • no abuse of discretion in giving an initial- aggressor instruction during deliberations because there was evidence on that issue and it was not injecting a new theory into the case
  • “[A]lthough the right of self-defense may justify a use of force, it will not justify the killing of an original aggressor as an act of retaliation or after the aggressor has abandoned the argument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.