Skip to main content

People v. Brown

Citations

  • 558 N.E.2d 309
  • 200 Ill. App. 3d 566
  • 146 Ill. Dec. 346
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 902
  • 1990 WL 85379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding witness opinion testimony about whether complainant engaged in forced or consensual sex was improper and prejudicial because it went to ultimate question of fact
  • holding witness opinion testimony about whether complainant engaged in forced or consensual sex was improper and prejudicial because it went to ultimate question of fact
  • holding witness opinion testimony about whether complainant engaged in forced or consensual sex was improper and prejudicial because it went to ultimate question of fact
  • “[T]he rule [on] inadmissibility of prior consistent statements also applies to a third party who seeks to testify concerning the witness’ prior consistent statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.