People v. Brooks
Citations
- 65 Cal. 295
- 4 P. 7
- 1884 Cal. LEXIS 528
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Assault with Intent to Commit Robbery—Arraignment — Previous Conviction—Confession of Defendant.—The repeal of section 1025 of the Penal Code extinguished the right of the court to ask a defendant • in a criminal case whether he had suffered a previous conviction; but where a previous conviction is charged, and the defendant is arraigned in the mode required by section 988 of the Penal Code, and in his plea voluntarily confesses the prior conviction, it is not necessary that the jury find specially as to the charge of previous conviction. A general verdict and the voluntary confession are sufficient.</p> <p>Id. — Punishment. — A defendant found guilty of an assault with intent to commit robbery, and a prior conviction of grand larceny, may be punished by imprisonment in the State prison for any term of years not less than ten.</p>
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-10-06· cited 18×
- People v. WheatleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-02-25· cited 18×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-09-12· cited 17×
- Ex Parte LairCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1925-02-28· cited 10×
- Adkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-12-02· cited 2×
- Ex Parte JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1941-11-19
- in Re Benevis, LLC, Dentistry of Brownsville, P.C., and Kool Smiles, P.C.Tex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2015-07-24
- People v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-05-31
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.