People v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s sentence was illegal because the restitution order included amounts from an unrelated juvenile delinquency case
• “[A]ny arguments [the] defendant made in his [Rule 35(c)] motions that are not specifically reasserted on appeal are abandoned, and we therefore do not address them.”
• “[A]ny arguments defendant made in his Crim. P. 35 motions that are not specifically reasserted on appeal are abandoned, and we therefore do not address them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of Colorado
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2021-12-20· cited 1,363×
• People v. Faussett
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-06-16· cited 833×
• People v. Bowerman
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2010-09-02· cited 191×
• People v. Lehmkuhl
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-06-20· cited 13×
• People v. Hunt
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2016-06-16· cited 5×
• v. Yakas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2019-08-01· cited 3×
• Audrey Lee Tennyson v. The People of the State of Colorado
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2025-05-27· cited 3×