Michigan Court of Appeals· 9/19/1979
People v. Brooks
Citations
- 285 N.W.2d 307
- 92 Mich. App. 393
- 1979 Mich. App. LEXIS 2353
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a procedure was arrived at in which both juries would be present for the prosecutor’s opening statement and the prosecutor’s direct examination of witnesses. At all other times only one jury would be present, each hearing the matters relevant to its own case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gillis, Burns, Kaufman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-02-14· cited 272×
- People v. HanaMichigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 149×
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1989-06-09· cited 146×
- State v. LambrightArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-28· cited 96×
- Hedlund v. SheldonArizona Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 65×
- People v. HoffmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1994-05-02· cited 52×
- State v. CorsiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1981-05-28· cited 39×
- Scarborough v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-04· cited 37×
- Woolbright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-04-22· cited 25×
- People v. KramerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-02-17· cited 24×
- State v. PrasertphongArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-02· cited 23×
- People v. GreenbergMichigan Court of Appeals· 1989-04-03· cited 19×
- People v. RodeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-09-09· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.