People v. Broach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Given the exclusive nature of the premises and the proximity in time to an actual drug sale, the searching officers had probable cause to believe that defendant was involved with the illegal activity within the apartment.”
• presence in apartment five minutes after a controlled buy subjects person to legitimate pat-down; with United States v. Cole, 628 F.2d 897 (5th Cir.1980) (mere presence at site of warrant search, without specific grounds to suspect danger, does not justify frisk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Belote v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-24· cited 9×
• State v. Hall
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-11-28· cited 7×
• People v. Broach
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-06-22· cited 5×
• Lippert v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1983-03-09· cited 5×
• People v. Jackson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-03-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Sibron v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
• Ybarra v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
• State v. Broadnax
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-03-31· cited 18×