People v. Brenda N.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the economic loss doctrine emerged following concerns that while foreseeability princi- ples offer some “nominal logical limit,” its broad conceptual application led to the requirement that a plaintiff establish some limiter on the risk of unbounded litigation
• awarding prejudgment interest when the party asserted that “even though the verdict reflects a lump sum, it was apparent from the amount that the jury had awarded (1) $450,000 that Quality Plus paid in settlement to JH Kelly on March 16, 2016; (2
• a trial court may award prejudgment interest “only if there were no disputed facts after the jury returned its verdict, and the court could have easily calculated the prejudgment interest based on the undisputed facts” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Farhang, 232 Or. App. at 356)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).