Skip to main content
· 6/23/1997

People v. Breaman

Citations

  • 939 P.2d 1348
  • 1997 Colo. LEXIS 507
  • 1997 WL 340663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, even where a defendant did not have a right to appointed counsel, \[hJaving made the decision to appoint such counsel ... the district court was not entitled to deny [the defendant] effective representation of that counsel\
  • stating that, even where a defendant did not have a right to appointed counsel, \[h]aving made the decision to appoint such counsel ... the district court was not entitled to deny [the defendant] effective representation of that counsel\
  • postconviction court resolving a Crim. P. 35(c) motion must make findings of fact and conclusions of law that are sufficient to set forth the basis of its ruling
  • appointed attorney must represent client, not \serve as the court's fact-finder\
  • appointed attorney must represent client, not \serve as the court's fact-finder\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.