People v. Branch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a criminal defendant has the right to rely on counsel as a “medium” between him and the state
• requiring trial court to give defendant warnings when he did not have counsel present
• prosecutorial use for impeachment purposes of defendant’s voluntary statements to psychiatrist during competency examination not violative of defendant’s Fifth or Sixth Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dunlap v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2007-05-14· cited 1,343×
• People v. Gennings
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-04-22· cited 488×
• People v. McCormick
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-04-07· cited 325×
• Cordell v. Klingsheim
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-31· cited 313×
• People v. Breidenbach
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-06-13· cited 162×
• Lanari v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-03-10· cited 75×
• People v. Dracon
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-11-15· cited 54×
• State v. Syvertson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 29×
• People v. Trujillo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-07-01· cited 23×
• People v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-05-08· cited 21×
• People v. Karpierz
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-10-05· cited 19×
• People v. Thomas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1997-06-26· cited 4×
• Higgins v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2016-10-03· cited 4×
• People v. Ridley
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-03-10· cited 2×
• Nathan DUNLAP, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2007-05-14