California Court of Appeal· 6/11/1998
People v. Bradley
Citations
- 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 244
- 64 Cal. App. 4th 386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The repeal of a statute which provides a remedy to a party is fully prospective and applies to pending actions.”
- \The repeal of a statute which provides a remedy to a party is fully prospective and applies to pending actions.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-12-23· cited 107×
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-11-04· cited 100×
- People v. SokCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-01-21· cited 86×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-07-09· cited 75×
- People v. VizcarraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-04-30· cited 73×
- People v. FuentesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2016-07-21· cited 72×
- People v. BonnettaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-04-27· cited 57×
- People v. Hoy ChanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-04-28· cited 43×
- People v. SolorzanoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-08-15· cited 29×
- In Re RenfrowCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-07-16· cited 29×
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-10· cited 25×
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-08-08· cited 23×
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Tyson Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-06-01· cited 17×
- People v. McCrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 11×
- People v. MoralesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-03-11· cited 9×
- Spielman v. Ex'pression Center for New MediaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-12-02· cited 2×
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-12-29· cited 1×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-06-10· cited 1×
- Manitoba Public Insurance Corp. v. Dakota Fire Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-12-20
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-06-27
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 3,137×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 1,878×
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 1,864×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-01-05· cited 1,478×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court· 1925-11-23· cited 945×
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-01-16· cited 601×
- Tapia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 401×
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-04-04· cited 285×
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-07-09· cited 281×
- People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-01-19· cited 214×
- People v. ScheidCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-17· cited 208×
- People v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1986-07-31· cited 193×
- People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-08-18· cited 178×
- People v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 154×
- People v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-08-18· cited 140×
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-12-14· cited 126×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-12-31· cited 122×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.