Skip to main content

People v. Bowman

Citations

  • 583 N.E.2d 114
  • 221 Ill. App. 3d 663
  • 164 Ill. Dec. 560
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 2022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant agreed to introduce the prior convictions at sentencing only and, as such, is estopped from asserting it as error
  • holding that the trial court appropriately considered the “prior convictions for DWR and DUI at the sentencing hearing”
  • finding that under section 111-3(c), the State was not required to show the defendant's prior convictions until sentencing
  • finding that under section 111 — 3(c), the State was not required to show the defendant’s prior convictions until sentencing
  • finding that under section 111-3(c), the State was not required to show the defendant’s prior convictions until sentencing
  • Fourth District finding, under section 111-3(c), State was not required to show the defendant’s prior convictions until sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.