· 9/24/2002
People v. Bowden
Citations
- 125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 513
- 102 Cal. App. 4th 387
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9871
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11113
- 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he Tighe majority opinion is unpersuasive, and we decline to follow or extend its reasoning in the context of the Three Strikes law.”
- “[T]he Tighe majority opinion is unpersuasive, and we decline to follow or extend its reasoning in the context of the Three Strikes law.”
- “[T]he Tighe majority opinion is unpersuasive, and we decline to follow or extend its reasoning in the context of the Three Strikes law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles S. Vogel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.