People v. Bounds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “prior apparently inconsistent statements *** were never made a part of the trial record”; therefore, “[d]espite the fact that they are before us here as part of the record on appeal, we may not consider such statements since they are [d]e hors the trial record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Weatherspoon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-08-04· cited 86×
• People v. Lewis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-31· cited 65×
• People v. Trimble
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-08· cited 31×
• People v. Dunn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-08· cited 28×
• People v. DePratto
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-26· cited 21×
• People v. Spates
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-08-08· cited 15×
• People v. Carmickle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-02-25· cited 9×
• United States v. Boyd
  U S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1983-10-14· cited 3×
• Peoria County Treasurer & Collector v. Grange
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-17· cited 1×
• People v. Ford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-05