People v. Bouie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, after reviewing precedents, that a single sale in the forum state did not establish personal jurisdiction in that forum
• holding “because [J. McIntyre Mach., Ltd. v. Nicastro] did not produce a majority opinion,” courts must follow Justice Breyer’s concurrence, “the crux of [which] was that the Supreme Court’s framework applying the stream-of-commerce theory . . . had not changed”
• finding no personal jurisdiction under a “stream of commerce” theory where plaintiff failed to identify sales of infringing products in forum
• following the stream of commerce theory articulated in World-Wide Volkswagen instead of Justice O'Connor's stream of commerce plus approach
• discussing the plurality Asahi decision and its effect on Federal Circuit precedent
• “The Supreme Court has yet to reach a consensus on the proper articulation of the stream-of-commerce theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).