People v. Borrelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the stalking statute was not unconstitutionally overbroad as it did not “inhibit a substantial amount of protected speech”
• holding that a stalking statute does not infringe on free speech rights because it “does not regulate the content of speech [as much] as the manner in which the communication is made.” (emphasis in original)
• holding that a stalking statute does not infringe on free speech rights because it \does not regulate the content of speech [as much] as the manner in which the communication is made.\ (emphasis in original)
• upholding the judgment against a stalker who threatened to kill the victim and her parents
• referring to Shackelford v. Shirley, 948 F.2d 935, 938 (5 Cir.1991)
• referring to Shackelford v. Shirley, 948 F.2d 935, 938 (5 Cir.1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).