People v. Bonczek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[h]aving shown the information to be confidential, one seeking a protective order must then demonstrate that disclosure might be harmful.”
• holding that plaintiff failed to establish a need for non-party’s testing data
• noting that 16 “[c]ourts have presumed that disclosure to a competitor is more harmful than disclosure 17 to a noncompetitor”
• noting that a party seeking a non-party’s sales information “must nevertheless establish that it is reasonably necessary for a fair opportunity to develop and prepare the ease for trial.”
• noting that the need for discovery “is diminished when the information is available elsewhere”
• noting “[c]ourts have presumed that disclosure to a competitor is more harmful than disclosure to a noncompetitor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).