People v. Bolar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that any prejudice in the introduction of testimony regarding other crimes committed by defendant is generally cured by sustaining the objection and instructing the jury to disregard the statement
• “While a person can possess something without delivering it, he cannot deliver it without possessing it. Therefore, when the jury found [the defendant] ‘delivered’ the cocaine, it also necessarily found that he possessed it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Hoffman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-12-21· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Tiller
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-12-17· cited 195×
• People v. Lee
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-19· cited 38×
• People v. Ellis
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-05-30· cited 24×
• People v. Barkauskas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-08-25· cited 23×
• People v. Sledge
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-06· cited 9×
• People v. Doherty
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-08· cited 5×