Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/22/2005

People v. Bock

Citations

827 N.E.2d 1089
357 Ill. App. 3d 160
293 Ill. Dec. 208
2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declining to follow Elliott because it found no statutory support for the conclusion that the circumstances surrounding a driver’s Breathalyzer test refusal is inadmissible
“General objections which do not inform the trial court of the basis for the claims of error made on appeal do not preserve the unspecified claims for review.”
“[g]eneral objections which do not inform the trial court of the basis for the claims of error made on appeal do not preserve the unspecified claims for review”
\[g]eneral objections\ do not preserve issues for review
“[g]eneral objections” do not preserve issues for review
“[gjeneral objections” do not preserve issues for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNULTY

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.