People v. Blaylock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the standard of review regarding a court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss an indictment on the basis of lost or missing evidence is whether the trial judge was correct as a matter of law
• finding that the standard of review regarding a court's ruling on a motion to dismiss an indictment on the basis of lost or missing evidence is whether the trial judge was correct as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Blaylock
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 27×
• People v. Voltaire
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-12-20· cited 7×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-12-02· cited 6×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• California v. Trombetta
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• State v. Lindsey
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-05-01· cited 163×
• State v. Jefferson
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1996-05-24· cited 87×
• People v. C.J.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 41×
• Fields v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-08-14· cited 24×
• State v. Vickers
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-12-06· cited 23×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-13· cited 16×
• People v. Walker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-29· cited 14×
• People v. Cora
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-13· cited 9×
• People v. Rhodes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-15· cited 5×